Okay, you know I had to go here at some point, so why not
now? Love it or hate it, sex has a place in advertising. Always has, always
will. Because sex sells. And lest we
forget: advertising is only the world’s SECOND oldest profession.
Now you may be surprised (or not if you know me well) that
this isn’t going to be a Victorian-inspired rant about objectification. Rather,
I’d like to take a step back and look at how (in my humble opinion) sexual attraction from XX’s (and XY's) works – and doesn’t work – around the
world.
Cut to several years later and I found myself working on a
global assignment with a group of excellent creatives from around the world. The
core idea had a wide range of interpretation and the team quickly divided: if
you were from South America or Europe, the interpretation was sexual. If you
were from the U.S., the minds went straight to a street fight. As the only XX in the group (and with the
words of aforementioned creative director still burned in my brain) I may have
been the only person in the room who could easily see the merit of either
direction.
Over the years, I have developed a bit of a theory of my own
about why I love certain campaigns that glorify sex but am incredibly offended
by others. Here goes:
There’s a “giggle factor” in the U.S. about nudity and
sexual attraction. A part of us that seems to be stuck somewhere between 12 and
14. (Hey isn’t that the same age as the onset of the video game love affair?)
There’s a cultural phenomenon that makes a lot of Americans look twice at a
girl on the beach with her bikini untied, even though she’s on her stomach.
Like we’ve seen something we weren’t supposed to see. A peep show.
Yes, she's topless. So is he. |
Maybe that’s why work outside of the U.S. tends to win my
heart in this arena. Work that should have me wringing my XX hands at the
“objectification of women” has me laughing out loud, smiling knowingly or
thinking “I wish I did that.” Take for example the much-used example of the Axe
effect (or Lynx effect, depending on where you’re from.) It resonates I believe
in large part because it’s based on a simple truth, well told: animal attraction.
No one is uptight or giggly, they are simply behaving as mammals are expected
to behave. Bonus of this campaign: no
more guessing for moms around the world. Now we instantly know when our son
develops and interest in girls. Just look for Axe in the shower. Please note that I believe good taste is everyone’s
responsibility. Ads that exploit or shock aren’t using sexual attraction to
sell, they are using objectification as power. That’s a different, horrible beast, and perhaps
the subject of a future story but not today. So know that I in no way condone
or support that crap.
Of course, I am now going to completely switch my theory for
a special hats off to W&K in the U.S. for Old Spice: Not only is it
brilliantly-written, well-cast and strategically differentiating, it’s the the
second epic campaign in a category. A campaign that has, at least in the U.S., overshadowed
its predecessor.
But Old Spice is the exception. Peep show, ditzy girls, and Three Stooges
with cleavage win the day more often than not in the U.S. That’s the stuff that
rubs me the wrong way, not the fact that “I’m not the target.” (Remember, this
is the XX who loved the women using a pipe in their shower as a stripper pole.)
No comments:
Post a Comment